LOOKING FOR MIDDLE GROUND IN THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE

LOOKING FOR MIDDLE GROUND IN THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE
CATEGORY: IMMIGRATION REFORM

Is it possible to find a middle ground on the right in the immigration debate that can unite both sides and forestall the eventuality of schism and holy war that would lead to disaster at the polls in November for Republicans?

Perhaps. If people were to get off their haunches and sit down like the friendly, rational, adults that we truly are, it may not be too late to salvage something from this mess. Let’s examine what we have in common before looking at where we part company.

First, and most importantly, there isn’t a conservative out there who isn’t for strengthening our borders. I think there is also overwhelming agreement that this issue should take precedence over all others. Shore up the borders first, then deal with the other problems.

A lot more @ http://tinyurl.com/kp2ov rightwingnuthouse

First of all the phrase 'middle ground' smells like 'compromise'. There can be no 'middle ground and no compromise'! Either we secure the border, don't grant 'worker permits', (Worker permits are amnesty by another name) and begin 'mass deportations of all illegal invaders Mexican or not' or we don't. If we don't do the aforementioned we have signed away our national sovereignty and condemned our children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren to live in a nation what 'will closely resemble a 3rd world pest-hole of today. '

There is never any 'middle ground or compromise' in right and wrong. The invasion of America is wrong and all the hand wringing and sob sistering by the usual suspects won't change that.

BTW, not all so called Conservatives back the securing of US borders. I've seen far to many comments on blogs by so called Conservatives to belief that horseshit.